Presidential Elections





Follow the 2012 Presidential Candidates on  YouTube Follow the 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter Follow the 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter


  Presidential Candidates  Age & Birthdate
  Presidential Candidates  Ancestry
  Presidential Candidates  Books
  Presidential Candidates  Careers
  Presidential Candidates  Childhood
  Presidential Candidates  Children
  Presidential Candidates  Education
  Presidential Candidates  Foreign Languages
  Presidential Candidates  Military Service
  Presidential Candidates  Parents & Grandparents
  Presidential Candidates  Religion
  Presidential Candidates  Siblings
  Presidential Candidates  Spouses
   
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Abortion
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Afghanistan
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Budget
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Business and Labor
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Capital Punishment
  Compare Presidential Candidates  China
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Civil Liberties
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Cuba
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Deficit
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Economy
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Education
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Energy
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Environment
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Foreign Affairs
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Guantanamo
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Gun Control
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Health Care
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Immigration
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Iran
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Iraq
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Israel
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Marijuana
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Minimum Wage
  Compare Presidential Candidates  National Security
  Compare Presidential Candidates  North Korea
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Palestinian Issue
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Poverty
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Prescription Drugs
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Same Sex / LGBT
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Social Security
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Stem Cell Research
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Taxes
  Compare Presidential Candidates  Trade Issues
   
   

   
  Republican Convention
    Chris Christie
    Rick Santorum
    Ann Romney
    Ted Cruz
    Mike Huckabee
    Condoleezza Rice
    Paul Ryan
    Clint Eastwood
    Jeb Bush
    Marco Rubio
    Mitt Romney
   
  Democratic Convention
    Debbie Wasserman Schultz
    Rahm Emmanuel
    Julian Castro
    Michelle Obama
    Sandra Fluke
    Elizabeth Warren
    Bill Clinton
    Caroline Kennedy
    John Kerry
    Jill Biden
    Joe Biden
    Barack Obama


Guantanamo Bay


Background


1The Guantanamo Bay Naval Base (GITMO), located in the Oriente Province in southern Cuba, is the oldest standing U.S. military installation outside of its territory. The 45-square mile area first came under U.S. control in 1898, towards the tail end of the Spanish-American War.

Recognizing the strategic advantage that Guantanamo Bay offers, the United States signed a 99-year lease with the newly independent Cuban government as a condition for the withdrawal of American forces from the mainland. A then princely sum of 2,000 gold coins, equivalent to a little over four thousand dollars today, was the agreed annual rent. Article VI and VII of the agreement, the Platt Amendment, stipulates that,
VI. That the Isle of Pines shall be omitted from the proposed constitutional boundaries of Cuba, the title thereto being left to future adjustment by treaty.

VII. That to enable the United States to maintain the independence of Cuba, and to protect the people thereof, as well as for its defense, the government of Cuba will sell or lease to the United States lands necessary for coaling or naval stations at certain specified points, to be agreed upon with the President of the United States.

In 1934, the Treaty of Relations was signed between the two governments to replace the Platt Amendment. The new treaty saw significantly reduced extra-constitutional American control over the Cuban government, but in return, they were granted the use of Guantanamo Bay for perpetuity.

Excerpts from Article III of the Treaty of Relations
“… So long as the United States of America shall not abandon the said naval station of Guantanamo or the two Governments shall not agree to a modification of its present limits, the station shall continue to have the territorial area that it now has, with the limits that it has on the date of the signature of the present Treaty...”

In the aftermath of the Fidel Castro-led Revolution of 1959, the Cuban government attempted to rescind the treaty, but the United States contends that Cuba had no legal basis for such a move. When the two countries formally broke off diplomatic ties on January 4, 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower issued the following statement,
“The termination of our diplomatic and consular relations with Cuba has no effect on the status of our Naval Station at Guantanamo. The treaty rights under which we maintain the Naval Station may not be abrogated without the consent of the United States.”

2The decision proved to be a correct one at the time, as Guantanamo Bay proved to be an invaluable strategic asset during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. In the words of Rear Admiral M.E. Murphy of the U.S. Navy (January 5, 1953),
“Guantanamo Bay affords a valuable operating area for the Construction Battalions of the Atlantic Fleet to a degree rivaled by no other naval installation in the world. Here, except for an occasional hurricane and a short season of rain, ideal weather permits a well-planned operating period - usually about six months in length - virtually uninterrupted.”

The United States continues to make their annual rent payment to Cuba to this day. A popular urban myth tells the story of how Cuban President, Fidel Castro, refuses to cash American rent checks for the last five decades as a matter of principle. In reality, Castro never had the chance to make such a symbolic statement as the United States Treasury has been making the rent payment to an account in the name of the Cuban people, inaccessible to the current Castro administration. The 2001 conversion of the naval base into a detention facility has led Cuba to charge the United States of breaking the terms of their lease. During a United Nations assembly on June 14, 2002, Cuba demanded that the United States return the territory to their control.

The Detention Camp


The 9/11 al-Qaeda organized jetliner attacks on the World Trade Center that claimed almost 3,000 American lives precipitated the establishment of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp. In the subsequent War On Terror, the Bush administration believed that the United States was handicapping itself as terrorist groups do not follow the norms of conventional warfare.

1As such, the only way to level the playing field was to play the game on their terms. The immediate incarceration of these terrorists and the intelligence gathered would justify the extreme measures taken. Furthermore, the expected detainees were deemed to be the “the worst of a very bad lot” and considered by some as among the most dangerous terrorists in the world. In the words of General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, these terrorists would “chew through a hydraulics cable to bring a C-17 down” - such were their threat.

The Guantanamo Bay detention facility, located outside of the United States territory, ensures captured terrorists receive neither the legal protection nor take advantage of the time-consuming process of the American criminal-justice system. It also protects members of the American armed forces from charges of violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice (Title 10, U.S. Code Chapter 47). The United States, in addition, did not recognize the captured terrorists as enemy combatants, and in doing so, deny them the rights accorded for prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention. The Bush administration claimed that these decisions were made with the safety of American citizens in mind.  

The conversion of the GITMO into a detention facility was completed on October 7, 2001, and operational command fell under the Southern Command Joint Task Force Guantanamo. The first batch of detainees, twenty of them, arrived on January 11, 2002. The total number of detainees incarcerated during its decade-long existence remains unclear, but WikiLeaks documents released in 2008 suggest there have been at least 780 prisoners.

Owing to ongoing operations, actual counter terrorism success using intelligence obtained from GITMO prisoners remains a closely held secret. Nevertheless, supporters of GITMO assert that it is a crucial tool in the ongoing War On Terror (or Overseas Contingency Operation). Former Vice President Dick Cheney recently claimed that the death of Osama Bin Laden should be credited to intelligence obtained from Guantanamo.

Some have pointed out the high rate of recidivism among released detainees as another reason for the facility, citing Abdullah Mehsud as a prime example. Mehsud was the purported mastermind of a 2007 bomb blast in Pakistan that took 31 lives - four years after his release from the GITMO facility.

Critics, however, charge that the Guantanamo Bay detention facility has done irreparable harm to America’s international standing and moral authority in the eyes of the world, and in the process, damaged the country’s leadership in human rights causes and heightened anti-American sentiments, especially among Islamic countries.

It began in the wake of the controversial 2004 case of Rasul vs. Bush (542 U.S. 466). The Supreme Court judged in favor of the petitioners, who had alleged that they were bystanders caught in an indiscriminate dragnet by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan and were subsequently denied legal counsel, the right to habeas corpus and contact with their family and friends. In the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court judgment, there was a marked increase in the contact between inmates and legal counsels, triggering an avalanche of first hand stories about the facility into the ears of a disbelieving American public.

This coincided with the resignation of the former chief prosecutor of Guantánamo’s Military Commission, Colonel Morris Davis, and its lead prosecutor, Lieutenant Darrel Vandeveld, who left their position under duress after being gradually sidelined for refusing to use evidence obtained through ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’. It also came in the wake of revelations of CIA- supervised prisoner abuse in the Baghdad Correctional Facility in Abu Ghraib, Iraq.

The enhanced interrogation techniques used in the GITMO camp includes,
  • Sensory deprivation and overload

  • Sleep deprivation

  • Electrocution

  • Induced hypothermia

  • Sexual degradation

  • Indiscriminate beatings

  • Religious Persecution (Interrogation conducted by a female contractor wearing bra, miniskirt and thongs; threats of smearing prisoners with fake menstrual blood; groping)

The extent of the abuse prevented an open trial for Mohammed al-Qahtani, a Saudi national and al-Qaeda operative who is believed to be the 20th hijacker for 9/11 (he was turned away by immigration officials at the Orlando International Airport five weeks before 9/11). The Convening Authority of the Guantanamo Military Commission, former judge Susan J. Crawford, ordered the charges against al-Qahtani to be dropped in May 2008, fearing the furor it would generate, as well as the inadmissibility of his confession should his torture became public. Al-Qahtani’s torture took place over a period of several months, sometimes stretching to 20 hours a day. It includes forced administration of an enema, leashing, beatings and enforced self-urination; all which eventually landed him in the hospital.

2The same WikiLeaks documents revealed that 150 released prisoners were ordinary civilians, with absolutely no ties whatsoever to any terrorist groups. Some of them were captured because they were wearing fake Casio watches, thought to be the watch of choice for al-Qaeda operatives.

A number of the remaining detainees were tribal soldiers, farmers and herdsmen who were sent to U.S. garrisons in return for a $5,000 bounty. A few were handed to Pakistani and Afghani authorities as punishment for personal or tribal disputes, sweetened by the same $5,000 reward.

The GITMO camp detainees also included an 89-year old man suffering from dementia and a 14-year old kidnap victim who was initially detained to provide intelligence on his captors’ modus operandi, only to be imprisoned along with the other prisoners.  Also detained was Sami al-Hajj, a reporter with Qatar-based broadcaster, Al-Jazeera, which drew furious reactions of journalists worldwide. All three were eventually released without charges being brought.

These allegations were corroborated in a sworn affidavit filed by Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, the Chief of Staff for former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in support of a suit brought by former GITMO camp detainee Adel Hassan Hamad against the U.S. government.

Excerpts from Colonel Wilkerson affidavit:
  • “The people who ended up in Guantanamo were mostly turned over to the US by Afghan warlords and others who received bounties of up to $5000 per head for each person they turned in. The majority of the 742 detainees had never seen a U.S. soldier in the process of their initial detention.”

  • “… that the likelihood was high that some of the Guantanamo detainees had been turned in to U.S. forces in order to settle local scores, for tribal reasons, or just as a method of making money...”

  • “… there was no real method of knowing why the prisoner had been detained in the first place…”

  • “… there was no meaningful way to determine whether they were terrorists, Taliban, or simply innocent civilians picked up on a very confused battlefield or in the territory of another state such as Pakistan...”

GITMO camp critics contend that the United States should not condone these blatant transgressions that go against everything the country stands for and the government should immediately charge the remaining prisoners for war crimes in an open court of law or return them to their country of origin.




 

 

2012 Libertarian Presidential Nominee
Former Governor of New Mexico

Gary Johnson

Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson

Johnson Position on Guantanamo

The sweeping powers accorded to the military and other national defense-related agencies under the guise of the War on Terror should be curtailed. Johnson wants an end to the practice of indefinite detention of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay; instead, these detainees should be tried under a civil or military court and there should be a complete end to interrogations involving either physical or psychological torture.
Johnson's profile, official website and positions on the issues



 
2012 Democratic Presidential Nominee
Current President of the United States

Barack Obama

Presidential Candidate Barack Obama

Obama Position on Guantanamo

General Policy On Guantanamo

Despite President Obama’s campaign pledge of closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, and his Executive Order to that effect issued two days after his inauguration, it is increasingly apparent that GITMO is here to stay. However, his promise of halting ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ in the camp has been fulfilled courtesy of his Executive Order issued on January 22, 2009.
“Section 3: Closure of Detention Facilities at Guantánamo
The detention facilities at Guantánamo for individuals covered by this order shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than 1 year from the date of this order. If any individuals covered by this order remain in detention at Guantánamo at the time of closure of those detention facilities, they shall be returned to their home country, released, transferred to a third country, or transferred to another United States detention facility in a manner consistent with law and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.”
January 22, 2009; Executive Order No: 13492, Signed by President Barack Obama

President Obama continues to face strong resistance in Congress on the subject of GITMO’s closure. The scheduled withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and Iraq signals the imminent closure of several Army and CIA detention facilities in those countries, which raises an increasing demand for an alternate detention facility for the prisoners held there– a further obstacle to Obama’s plan. He appeared to have accepted the inevitable with the signing of a new Executive Order on March 7, 2011, which extended the shelf-life of GITMO indefinitely.
“… in order to ensure that military detention of individuals now held at the U.S. Naval Station, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (Guantánamo), who were subject to the interagency review under section 4 of Executive Order 13492 of January 22, 2009, continues to be carefully evaluated and justified, consistent with the national security…

Section 1: Scope and Purpose.
(a) The periodic review described in section 3 of this order applies only to those detainees held at Guantánamo on the date of this order, whom the interagency review established by Executive Order 13492 has (i) designated for continued law of war detention; or (ii) referred for prosecution, except for those detainees against whom charges are pending or a judgment of conviction has been entered.
(b) This order is intended solely to establish, as a discretionary matter, a process to review on a periodic basis the executive branch's continued, discretionary exercise of existing detention authority in individual cases…

Section 2: Standard for Continued Detention.
Continued law of war detention is warranted for a detainee subject to the periodic review in Section 3 of this order if it is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States.

Section 3: Periodic Review
The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate a process of periodic review of continued law of war detention for each detainee described in section 1(a) of this order. In consultation with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense shall issue implementing guidelines governing the process…”
March 7, 2011; Executive Order No: 13567, Signed by President Barack Obama

On Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

Oppose
“Waterboarding is torture. It’s contrary to America’s traditions, it’s contrary to our ideals, that’s not who we are, that’s not how we operate. We don’t need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism. We did the right thing by ending that practice. If we want to lead around the world, part of our leadership is setting a good example… And anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding would say that that is torture and that’s not something we do. Period.”
November 15, 2011; President Obama responding to a question on waterboarding in a press conference during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit in Kapolei, Hawaii.



“Section 6: Humane Standards of Confinement
No individual currently detained at Guantánamo shall be held in the custody or under the effective control of any officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or at a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, except in conformity with all applicable laws governing the conditions of such confinement, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. The Secretary of Defense shall immediately undertake a review of the conditions of detention at Guantánamo to ensure full compliance with this directive. Such review shall be completed within 30 days and any necessary corrections shall be implemented immediately thereafter.”
January 22, 2009; Executive Order No: 13492, Signed by President Barack Obama

“Section 1.Revocation.Executive Order 13440 of July 20, 2007, is revoked. All executive directives, orders, and regulations inconsistent with this order, including but not limited to those issued to or by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from September 11, 2001, to January 20, 2009, concerning detention or the interrogation of detained individuals, are revoked to the extent of their inconsistency with this order...

Sec. 3.Standards and Practices for Interrogation of Individuals in the Custody or Control of the United States in Armed Conflicts.
(a)Common Article 3 Standards as a Minimum Baseline.Consistent with the requirements of the Federal torture statute, 18 U.S.C. 2340–2340A, section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. 2000dd, the Convention Against Torture, Common Article 3, and other laws regulating the treatment and interrogation of individuals detained in any armed conflict, such persons shall in all circumstances be treated humanely and shall not be subjected to violence to life and person (including murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture), nor to outrages upon personal dignity (including humiliating and degrading treatment), whenever such individuals are in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States.
(b)Interrogation Techniques and Interrogation-Related Treatment.Effective immediately, an individual in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, in any armed conflict, shall not be subjected to any interrogation technique or approach, or any treatment related to interrogation, that is not authorized by and listed in Army Field Manual 2–22.3 (Manual)… Nothing in this section shall preclude the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or other Federal law enforcement agencies, from continuing to use authorized, non-coercive techniques of interrogation that are designed to elicit voluntary statements and do not involve the use of force, threats, or promises.

Sec. 4.Prohibition of Certain Detention Facilities, and Red Cross Access to Detained Individuals.
(a)CIA Detention.The CIA shall close as expeditiously as possible any detention facilities that it currently operates and shall not operate any such detention facility in the future.”
January 22, 2009; Executive Order No: 13491, Signed by President Barack Obama
Obama's profile, official website and positions on the issues



 
2012 Republican Presidential Nominee
Former Governor of Massachusetts

Mitt Romney

Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney

Romney Position on Guantanamo

General Policy On Guantanamo

Romney is a noted advocate of GITMO and has been on record criticizing former President Bush for contemplating its closure and President Obama for his calls to close it.
“Guantanamo Bay plays an important role in protecting our nation from violent, heinous terrorists…”
June 22, 2007; Speaking to reporters during a campaign stop in Helena, Montana
“ …You said they’re gonna be at Guantanamo? I’m glad they’re at Guantanamo. I don’t want them on our soil. I want them at Guantanamo where they don’t get the access to lawyers that they’d get when they’re on our soil. I don’t want them in our prisons, I want them there. Some people say that we should close Guantanamo, my view is we outta double Guantanamo.”
May 15, 2007; FoxNews Republican Presidential Debate, University of South Carolina, Columbia
"Today, the Supreme Court will once again hear arguments on the detention of captured terrorists being held at Guantanamo Bay. Some people view Guantanamo as a symbol of American aggression. I view it as a symbol of American resolve.
"Our country is asking young men and women in our military and intelligence services, and their families, to sacrifice beyond all knowing to capture or kill radical Jihadists before they plan and execute another attack on the United States. To win this fight, we must be able to detain and interrogate the terrorists they catch.
"The base at Guantanamo is designed to hold and question enemy combatants who pose a threat to the nation or have intelligence value. Closing and relocating the facility to the heartland of the United States, as some have suggested, would pose an undue risk to innocent Americans and, as today's arguments demonstrate, could have profound legal implications. So long as it remains a vital tool to keep America safe, I will fight to keep Guantanamo Bay open."
December 5, 2007; Press release on Guantanamo Bay

On Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

Supports
“But I do not believe, as a presidential candidate that it’s wise for us to describe precisely what techniques we’ll use in interrogating people. I oppose torture. I would not be in favor of torture in any way, shape or form. As I just said, as a presidential candidate, I don’t think it is wise for us to describe specifically which measures we would and would not use. And that is something I would like to receive the counsel of not only Senator McCain but of a lot of other people. And there are people who for many, many years get the information we need to make sure to protect our country. By the way, I wanna make sure these folks are kept at Guantanamo. I don’t want people who are carrying out attacks in this country are brought into our jail system and be given legal representation in this country. I wanna make sure that what happen to Khalid Sheikh Mohamed happens to other people who are terrorists. He was captured, he was the so-called mastermind of the 9/11 tragedy, and he turn to his captors and he said, “I’ll see you in New York with my lawyers.” I presumed ACLU layers. That’s not what happened. He went to Guantanamo and he met G.I and CIA interrogators and that’s just exactly how it ought to be.”
November 28, 2007; CNN/Youtube Republican Presidential Debate, St. Petersburg, Florida

Romney's profile, official website and positions on the issues



 


 

 

Declared 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate
U.S. Representative from the State of Texas

Ron Paul

Presidential Candidate Ron Paul

Paul Position on Guantanamo

General Policy On Guantanamo

Paul has made it clear on repeated occasions that he is in favor of shutting down GITMO.
“Question: Where do you stand on Guantanamo?

Congressman Ron Paul: Shut it down. The current rationale at Guantanamo is based on the false premise that detainees are not entitled to due process protections. I support court decisions recognizing fundamental human rights, such as habeas corpus. Again, this is an issue that flies in the face of our civic and legal traditions as outlined in the Constitution. As such, I see no purpose for continuing the facility.”
June 28, 2007; Interview with Muckraker Report
“It should be closed because we don't need it. It was unnecessary, the way these prisoners were captured was very questionable. They haven't had really due process. So, the real thugs that need to be tried, they ought to be tried.

They (The Democrats) have deleted the funding mainly because the Republicans have really won the argument… If you don't support the continuation of these military tribunals and you don't support Guantanamo, maybe you support sending these people into your district and they'll be your neighbors… The Democrats were convinced that [the Republicans] won the PR fight, and so therefore, [the Democrats] all became squeamish. And even the president (Obama) backed down. That's why there's no funding for closing Guantanamo, and I guess it will be open for an indefinite future.”
22 May 2009; Paul on The Glenn Beck Show

On Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

Oppose
“Torture is illegal, by our laws and it’s illegal by international laws… Well, waterboarding is torture, and many other (illegible). It’s illegal under international law and under our law. It’s also immoral. It’s also very impractical. There’s no evidence that you really get reliable evidence. Why would you accept the position of torturing a hundred people because you know one person might have information? And that’s what you do when you accept the principle of torture. I think it’s uncivilized, it has no practical advantages and it’s really un-American to accept on principle that we will torture people that we capture.”
Nov 12, 2011; CBS News/National Journal GOP Presidential Debate, Spartanburg, South Carollina



“While Congress is sidetracked by who said what to whom and when, our nation finds itself at a crossroads on the issue of torture. We are at a point where we must decide if torture is something that is now going to be considered justifiable and reasonable under certain circumstances, or is America better than that?

‘Enhanced interrogation’ as some prefer to call it, has been used throughout history, usually by despotic governments, to cruelly punish or to extract politically useful statements from prisoners. Governments that do these things invariably bring shame on themselves.

In addition, information obtained under duress is incredibly unreliable, which is why it is not admissible in a court of law. Legally valid information is freely given by someone of sound mind and body. Someone in excruciating pain, or brought close to death by some horrific procedure is not in any state of mind to give reliable information, and certainly no actions should be taken solely based upon it.

For these reasons, it is illegal in the United States and illegal under Geneva Conventions. Simulated drowning, or water boarding, was not considered an exception to these laws when it was used by the Japanese against US soldiers in World War II. In fact, we hanged Japanese officers for war crimes in 1945 for water boarding. Its status as torture has already been decided by our own courts under this precedent. To look the other way now, when Americans do it, is the very definition of hypocrisy.


The government’s own actions and operations in torturing people, and in acting on illegally obtained and unreliable information to kill and capture, are the most radicalizing forces at work today, not any religion, nor the fact that we are rich and free. The fact that our government engages in evil behavior under the auspices of the American people is what poses the greatest threat to the American people, and it must not be allowed to stand.”
May 24, 2009; Texas Straight Talk: Torturing The Rule of Law



More on Paul  



 
Declared 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate


Matt Snyder

Presidential Candidate Matt Snyder

Snyder Position on Guantanamo

Snyder’s opines that if a guy like Obama doesn’t close Gitmo, despite campaigning heavily on its closure, then there must be a pretty good reason for keeping it open.

More on Snyder  



 
Declared 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate
Businessman

Vern Wuensche

Presidential Candidate Vern Wuensche

Wuensche Position on Guantanamo

• Wuensche believes that Guantanomo as a state of the art facility should continue to be used to hold enemy combatants.

• He believes that only military tribunals should be used to try terrorists.

More on Wuensche  



 
Support our website with Google Plus


Comment on Guantanamo



    © 2007-2012 presidential-candidates.org
About Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact Us 2016 Candidates